Underdogs dismantle Kings to remain perfect

They came, they saw, they conquered...then the Real Housing Haifa Underdogs went home, still unbeaten and atop the standings in the Kraft Family IFL. 

In the league’s second annual Chanukah Bowl on Friday at Kraft Stadium in Jerusalem, the Underdogs soundly defeated the host Blue Sun Music Jerusalem Kings, 56-38, in a game that prominently featured the high-flying offenses and quick-strike capabilities of both teams. 

The win moved the team from Haifa to 3-0 on the season and kept them in first place with a one-game advantage over the Dancing Camel Modi’n Pioneers (2-1). The loss sends the Kings to 1-2 and into fourth-place in the five-team league, heading into a two-week hiatus. 

Rounding out the standing are the third-place Big Blue Jerusalem Lions, who sit at 1-1, and the bottom-dwelling Mike’s Place Tel Aviv Sabres, who are still winless at 0-3. 

As has typically been the case in Kings’ games so far, the scoring got started quickly on Friday and never really stopped until, literally, the final play. The contest featured fourteen total touchdowns and just two punts. Most of the points came by way of good old-fashioned, playground-style, throw-it-up-and-catch-it pigskin, and this was one aerial assault that was refreshingly entertaining to all those in attendance. When it was all said and done, the game set an IFL record for most yards through the air for both teams combined, at 424, and affirmed the two primary signal-callers, both league-newcomers, as the best that Israeli football has to offer. 

All in all, it was a fairly evenly-played match but for a number of crucial turnovers that ultimately doomed the Kings. In fairness, however, even though the score remained somewhat close until the very end, five minutes into the game the Underdogs had built a two-possession gap that they would never relinquish. The Kings never got any closer than 10 points from that point and it appeared, from the sidelines at least, that Haifa had come well-prepared to fend off anything Jerusalem could throw at it. 

Underdogs quarterback Itai Ashkenazi came out gunning and found big receiver Idan Maor on Haifa’s first play from scrimmage for a 41-yard gain. That set up a two-yard keeper from Ashkenazi on the very next play for the game’s first touchdown. Ashkenazi would finish his day, one that was shortened due to a recurring thumb injury, 5-7 for 131 yards and three TDs in addition to the one on the ground. He paved the way for backup Ori Shterenbach to come in for what amounted to mop-up work. Shterenbach himself had quite the afternoon, going 4/5 in extra point attempts and tossing two botched snaps for two-point conversions to alert power-back Niv Medlinger. 

While Kings quarterback Joseph Marticius responded to the early score immediately with a two-play drive of his own, culminating in a 14-yard TD reception by Eli Boymelgreen, Ashkenzi skipped back onto the field and raised the ante with a 45-yard deep strike to Saar Barda that made it a 15-6 affair at the seven-minute mark. Another Haifa touchdown extended the lead to 22-6 after the first quarter and the game continued in the same vein, with the Underdogs and Kings trading scoring blows, but with the team from the North landing a few extra shots. 

The Kings were plagued by fumbles, four lost out of six total, all credited to Marticius. While the Jerusalem QB threw for 230 yards and six TDs and ran for 92 yards, a paltry 44% completion rate and two picks to go along with the slippery hands were, all together, just too much for his Kings to overcome. I’m sure he will take his lumps and come back after the break ready to make up for this one. 

There were a number of noteworthy individual performances from both sides. For Jerusalem, Chaim Gross continued his torrid pace, catching four passes for 139 yards and three scores. He now has nine TDs on the season. For Haifa, Barda was in action on almost every play of the game, catching two touchdowns and playing on both sides of the ball, as well as handling the kicking and punting duties and returning a kickoff to boot. Shachar Yeshurun also had a pair of scores for the Underdogs and played his best all-around complete game in a while. Medlinger, as well, had a great outing with two fumble recoveries plus the two conversions from Shterenbach. 

However the player that most stood out was Haifa’s Omer Kedmi, even while having to leave mid-way through the fourth because of a back flare-up. He was in the face of Marticius constantly and was the primary reason for the passer’s poor 11-25 showing. He also racked up two sacks and had a crucial 24-yard fumble-recovery-and-return for a score that made it a 37-18 game and swung the momentum back to his team’s side to open the second half. He is honored as this week’s Mike’s Place player of the game.  

The IFL returns on Thursday, January 8, 2009 with the first-ever regular season meeting between the cross-town rival Kings and Lions at Kraft Stadium.

 


Comments
  • Good game. Kings fought well but Haifa simply were better organized and had no worries about doing what they do. Although it wasn't cool of Haifa taking that fake knee, last point with 7 secs left. that was simply a slap in the face. the kings were right to walk off. i hope it gives them aggression to beat them the next time they meet.

    by Avi - 12/29/2008 4:15:21 PM
  • if the league decides to use points as the tie breaker, then thata the sort of play they will get...

    by pseudonym - 12/29/2008 11:36:19 PM
  • Like mentiond before, we (Haifa) and i guess all teams in the IFL, must score as much points as possible. if points are tie breakers, then we have no other choice. i am sorry if it's look bad, and the Kings thought we played unsportsmnlike, but if we will have the same W-L ratio at the end of the season, we must take under considiration the points scored (that is the IFL managment desicion)even if that mean that we will have to play until the last second, and not kneel down like accepted. i am sure that the Kings would do the same.

    by Itay - 12/30/2008 2:23:34 AM
  • I like Football

    by I like football - 12/30/2008 3:12:42 AM
  • Even if the refs, fans, and players on the losing team didn't like it, the touchdown still requires a chance for an extra point try even if time had expired. Why was that denied Haifa?

    by observer - 12/30/2008 5:30:21 AM
  • Observer, IFL follows NCAA rules, if time is expired and the team has won without needing to kick an extra point, then you don't kick. If the extra point would give a chance for the team to win, then it would be done.

    by Itamar Levin - 12/30/2008 6:01:15 AM
  • replying to itay.
    at the end of your commentary you wrote about the point system and tie-breakers and running up the score at the end, "i am sure that the Kings would do the same."
    NO they wouldn't. obviously they were mad enough to walk off the field. they would never do that. even if they could the next game the 2 teams meet, they wouldn't.
    but, at the same time i understand that haifa needs points.
    the ifl point tie-breaker system is stupid. if anything that might make the teams hate each other. i vote for change! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN!

    by moe - 12/30/2008 7:20:23 AM
  • Making the points a decider in the football it's really bad! It's not a soccer and the game is not really designed to it... It just kill the sportsmanship!

    by Max - 12/30/2008 8:54:18 AM
  • i agree with everything Max wrote, except for his grammar...

    by pseudonym - 12/30/2008 11:13:23 AM
  • I don't agree with Max. I don't think its possible to do any other way at the moment when there's only five teams in the league. I don't agree with Haifa going for the score when there wasn't a point, but its not like they pretended to kneel and then threw the pass. It was a legit play. If you guys believe in karma then what goes around will come around.

    by Itamar Levin - 12/30/2008 12:11:19 PM
  • be aware against tel aviv the kings did kneel instead of running up the score

    that's what sportsmanship is

    by kings fan - 12/30/2008 1:59:40 PM
  • I think that everyone has got to calm down about this whole point-differential thing!
    First of all, we definitely need a system in place to determine tie-breakers and it is not as simple as you think. Second, point-differential is NOT the first determinant to break ties, rather head-to-head is (which may not work in a three-way tie). Third, in a five team league the likelihood of a tie is increased and the system will naturally have to be complicated to determine what to go by after head-to-head. The way that the IFL chooses to decide tie-breakers is solely a league decision and, of course, there will be people that will be upset and think it is unfair no matter what the system chosen is.
    All football leagues (primarily the NCAA and NFL) have extremely complex systems in place because it is not that easy to decide once head-to-head doesn’t work.
    FOR EXAMPLE ONLY (THIS IS NOT THE IFL'S SYSTEM) in the NFL:
    In a tie between ONLY TWO clubs, the following is the priority of determining the better place:
    1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
    2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
    3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
    4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games if applicable.
    5. Best net points in division games.
    6. Best net points in all games.
    7. Strength of schedule.
    8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
    9. Coin Toss.
    (continued…)

    by Uriel (Editor) - 12/30/2008 2:31:37 PM
  • (…continued)
    In the NFL, (NOT THE IFL, BUT JUST AS AN EXAMPLE), in a tie between THREE OR MORE clubs, the following is the priority of determining the better place:
    1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the clubs).
    2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
    3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
    4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
    5. Best net points in division games.
    6. Best net points in all games.
    7. Strength of schedule.
    8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
    9. Coin Toss.
    Note: If one team wins multiple-team tiebreaker to advance to playoff round, remaining teams revert to Step One of two-club format

    As you can see, suffice it to say it is not an easy process and the league is working out the right approach to take to avoid as much animosity between the teams as possible and complaints of running up the score (although people ALWAYS complain, no matter what or where!). Just please understand that it is not as easy as it seems and that head-to-head, when it works, is the number 1 determinant in the case of a tie!
    All that said, for now, please stop this ridiculous bickering and focus on football!

    by Uriel (Editor) - 12/30/2008 2:36:08 PM
  • can someone put the right photos up of the haifa kings game. currently the photos up r the game against telaviv of moddin

    by sam - 12/30/2008 3:04:45 PM
  • pictures are up....

    http://www.ifl.co.il/61/section.aspx/album/24

    by Itamar Levin - 12/30/2008 9:43:38 PM
Comment will appear when it is approved.

Name

Email

Comment


Back